Building Production AI Agents with Claude API: A Complete Guide
I run 11 AI agents in production—from BellaBot (call screening) to CQ Marketing automations that cut manual labor by 80%. Here's how I build Claude API agents that actually work: architecture patterns, prompt engineering for 95% accuracy, Retell voice integration, and n8n orchestration.
Introduction: Why Claude for AI Agents?
I currently have 11 AI agents running in production across my business and client systems. These aren't toy demos or proof-of-concepts—they're production-grade agents handling real work: screening phone calls, qualifying leads, scheduling appointments, processing documents, and automating customer support.
After building agents with GPT-4, Gemini, and Claude, I've standardized on Claude API (specifically Sonnet 4.6) for 90% of my agent deployments. Here's why:
- Superior instruction following — Claude executes complex, multi-step prompts more reliably than GPT-4
- 200k token context window — I can include entire documentation sets, conversation histories, and knowledge bases
- Lower hallucination rate — Critical for production systems where accuracy matters
- Better at saying "I don't know" — Instead of making up answers, Claude admits uncertainty and follows fallback protocols
- Cost-effective for production — Sonnet 4.6 costs $3 per million input tokens, significantly cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo
In this guide, I'm sharing the exact architecture, code, and strategies I use to build AI agents that run 24/7 without constant babysitting. This is what I've learned deploying agents that have handled 12,000+ customer interactions across VIXI clients.
Architecture: Multi-Agent vs Single Agent Systems
The biggest mistake I see developers make is trying to build one "super agent" that does everything. This creates a brittle, hard-to-debug system with prompts that balloon to 10,000+ tokens.
The better approach: specialized micro-agents orchestrated through a coordinator. Each agent has a narrow, well-defined job. A coordinator agent routes tasks to the appropriate specialist.
My Production Architecture Pattern
Here's the architecture I use for CQ Marketing's lead processing system—5 specialized agents coordinated by n8n:
- Router Agent — Analyzes incoming lead data and determines which specialists to activate
- Qualifier Agent — Evaluates lead quality using custom scoring rubric (budget, timeline, fit)
- Researcher Agent — Enriches lead data via LinkedIn, company website, and tech stack detection
- Outreach Agent — Generates personalized email sequences based on enrichment data
- Scheduler Agent — Handles calendar coordination and follow-up sequences
Each agent runs independently. The router determines which agents to invoke based on the lead source and data completeness. This modular design means I can:
- Test and improve individual agents without affecting the whole system
- Scale specific agents independently (I run 3 instances of the Researcher Agent during peak hours)
- Replace underperforming agents without rebuilding the entire workflow
- Monitor and debug each agent's performance in isolation
When to Use Single vs Multi-Agent
Not every task needs multiple agents. Here's my decision framework:
Use Single Agent When:
- Task has linear, predictable flow (e.g., form processing)
- Less than 3 distinct decision points
- Low volume (<100 requests/day)
- Acceptable to retry entire task on failure
Use Multi-Agent When:
- Complex decision trees with 5+ branches
- High volume requiring parallel processing
- Different specialists needed (research vs writing vs analysis)
- Partial failures should be recoverable
For BellaBot (my call screening agent), I use a single agent because call flow is linear: answer → identify caller → qualify intent → transfer or schedule. For CQ Marketing's lead pipeline, I use multi-agent because it requires parallel research, sequential outreach, and complex routing logic.
Building BellaBot: A Call Screening Agent That Works
BellaBot is a voice AI agent I built for VIXI that screens incoming calls, qualifies leads, and books appointments. It's powered by Claude Sonnet 4.6 + Retell AI for voice synthesis. After 1,200+ calls, it maintains a 94% caller satisfaction rate and has saved clients 60+ hours/month of manual call handling.
The Core Agent Implementation
Here's the actual Claude API integration I use for BellaBot. This runs on Next.js API routes deployed to Vercel:
// app/api/bellabot/route.ts
import Anthropic from '@anthropic-ai/sdk';
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server';
const anthropic = new Anthropic({
apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY,
});
export async function POST(request: Request) {
try {
const { transcript, context, callerInfo } = await request.json();
const message = await anthropic.messages.create({
model: 'claude-sonnet-4-20250514',
max_tokens: 1024,
temperature: 0.3, // Low temp for consistency
system: `You are BellaBot, a professional call screening assistant for VIXI.
Your role:
- Greet callers warmly and professionally
- Identify their reason for calling
- Qualify if they're a potential client (budget $5k+, timeline <90 days)
- Book appointments for qualified leads
- Politely deflect spam/sales calls
Personality: Professional, warm, efficient. Never robotic.
Current business hours: Mon-Fri 9AM-5PM CST
Available appointment slots: {context.availableSlots}
If qualified lead: "I'd love to schedule a consultation with Carlos. What works better for you - this Thursday at 2 PM or Friday at 10 AM?"
If not qualified: "Thank you for your interest. I'll have someone follow up via email within 24 hours."
If spam: "We're not interested, but thank you for calling. Have a great day!"`,
messages: [
{
role: 'user',
content: `Call transcript so far:
${transcript}
Caller identified as: ${callerInfo.name || 'Unknown'}
Caller phone: ${callerInfo.phone || 'Unknown'}
What should BellaBot say next? Provide ONLY the response, no explanations.`
}
]
});
const response = message.content[0].text;
// Extract intent for routing
const intent = await extractIntent(response, transcript);
// Log to Supabase for training data
await logInteraction({
transcript,
response,
intent,
callerInfo,
timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
});
return NextResponse.json({
response,
intent,
shouldTransfer: intent === 'qualified_hot_lead',
});
} catch (error) {
console.error('BellaBot error:', error);
// Fallback response
return NextResponse.json({
response: "I apologize, I'm having technical difficulties. Let me transfer you to someone who can help.",
intent: 'error',
shouldTransfer: true,
});
}
}
async function extractIntent(response: string, transcript: string) {
// Simple keyword matching for intent classification
// In production, I use a separate Claude call for this
const lowerResponse = response.toLowerCase();
if (lowerResponse.includes('schedule') || lowerResponse.includes('appointment')) {
return 'qualified_lead';
} else if (lowerResponse.includes('not interested') || lowerResponse.includes('no thanks')) {
return 'not_qualified';
} else if (lowerResponse.includes('transfer')) {
return 'qualified_hot_lead';
}
return 'information_gathering';
}Key Implementation Details
- Temperature 0.3 — Low temperature ensures consistent, predictable responses. No creativity needed for call screening.
- System prompt includes examples — Exact phrasing for common scenarios reduces variability.
- Context injection — Available appointment slots are dynamically injected from Calendly API.
- Fallback handling — If API fails, agent defaults to transferring to human. Never leaves caller hanging.
- Conversation logging — Every interaction saved to Supabase for quality monitoring and fine-tuning.
Integration with Retell AI for Voice
BellaBot uses Retell AI for voice synthesis and transcription. Here's how the integration works:
// Retell webhook handler
// app/api/retell/webhook/route.ts
export async function POST(request: Request) {
const { event, call_id, transcript, caller_id } = await request.json();
if (event === 'speech_completed') {
// User finished speaking, generate agent response
const response = await fetch(`${process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_URL}/api/bellabot`, {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify({
transcript,
context: {
availableSlots: await getAvailableSlots(),
callerId: caller_id,
},
callerInfo: {
phone: caller_id,
name: await lookupCallerName(caller_id),
},
}),
});
const { response: agentText, shouldTransfer } = await response.json();
// Send response back to Retell for TTS
return NextResponse.json({
response: agentText,
actions: shouldTransfer ? ['transfer_to_number:+1234567890'] : [],
end_call: false,
});
}
return NextResponse.json({ success: true });
}This architecture gives you full control over the agent's behavior while leveraging Retell's excellent voice quality (they use ElevenLabs under the hood). The result is a voice agent that sounds natural, responds intelligently, and handles edge cases gracefully.
Prompt Engineering for 95% Accuracy
The difference between an 80% accurate agent (unusable) and a 95% accurate agent (production-ready) comes down to prompt engineering discipline. Here are the five techniques that took BellaBot from 82% to 94% caller satisfaction:
1. Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Complex Decisions
For tasks requiring multi-step logic (like lead qualification), explicitly instruct Claude to show its reasoning:
system: `You are a lead qualification agent.
For each lead, think through:
1. Budget: Do they have $5k+ to spend? (look for explicit mentions or company size indicators)
2. Timeline: Do they need a solution within 90 days? (urgency language, current pain points)
3. Fit: Does their problem match our services? (compare to service list)
Show your reasoning in <thinking> tags, then provide final qualification in <result> tags.
Example:
<thinking>
- Budget: Mentioned "$50k marketing budget" → HIGH
- Timeline: Said "need this ASAP" and "Q1 launch" → HIGH
- Fit: Looking for "lead gen automation" which matches our n8n service → HIGH
Overall: QUALIFIED
</thinking>
<result>
Qualified: Yes
Score: 9/10
Reason: High budget, urgent timeline, perfect service fit
Next Action: Schedule discovery call
</result>`
messages: [
{
role: 'user',
content: `Lead: "We're a B2B SaaS company spending about $8k/month on Google Ads but can't track ROI. Need better attribution by end of Q1. Can you help?"`
}
]This technique increased my qualifier agent's accuracy from 79% to 93%. The chain-of-thought reasoning is stripped out before showing results to users, but it dramatically improves decision quality.
2. Few-Shot Examples for Edge Cases
Include 3-5 examples of tricky scenarios in your system prompt:
system: `When handling spam/sales calls, be polite but firm: Example 1: Caller: "Hi, I'm calling about your car's extended warranty..." You: "We're not interested, but thank you for calling. Have a great day!" [END CALL] Example 2: Caller: "I'd like to speak to the owner about SEO services we offer..." You: "We have an agency partner for that already, but I appreciate you reaching out. Take care!" [END CALL] Example 3: Caller: "This is Rachel from card services..." You: "Not interested, thanks!" [END CALL] Never engage with spam. Never be rude. Always end professionally.`
3. Structured Output with JSON Mode
For agents that need to trigger downstream actions, use structured output:
const message = await anthropic.messages.create({
model: 'claude-sonnet-4-20250514',
max_tokens: 1024,
system: `Respond with JSON only:
{
"response": "What you say to the caller",
"intent": "qualified_lead | not_qualified | needs_info | spam",
"confidence": 0.0-1.0,
"nextAction": "schedule | transfer | email_followup | end_call",
"extractedData": {
"company": "string or null",
"budget": "number or null",
"timeline": "string or null"
}
}`,
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: transcript }]
});
const parsed = JSON.parse(message.content[0].text);
// Now you can programmatically route based on intentStructured output eliminates parsing errors and makes your agent code cleaner. This is critical for production systems where you need reliable automation triggers.
4. Negative Instructions (What NOT to Do)
Explicitly tell Claude what to avoid:
- Never say "I'm an AI" or mention you're automated
- Never make up information you don't have
- Never quote prices unless explicitly provided in context
- Never process payments or collect credit card info
- Never promise specific results or guarantees
5. Version Control Your Prompts
I store all system prompts in lib/prompts/ with version numbers:
// lib/prompts/bellabot-v3.ts
export const BELLABOT_SYSTEM_PROMPT_V3 = `
You are BellaBot v3.2.1
Last updated: 2026-02-15
[Full system prompt here...]
Changelog:
- v3.2.1: Added handling for international callers
- v3.2.0: Improved spam detection accuracy
- v3.1.5: Added appointment rescheduling logic
`;
// Usage
import { BELLABOT_SYSTEM_PROMPT_V3 } from '@/lib/prompts/bellabot-v3';
const message = await anthropic.messages.create({
system: BELLABOT_SYSTEM_PROMPT_V3,
// ...
});Version control lets you A/B test prompts, roll back bad changes, and track which prompt versions correlate with quality metrics. Treat prompts as code, not throwaway strings.
Integration with Retell AI for Voice Agents
Building text-based agents is straightforward. Adding voice capability is where most developers struggle. I use Retell AI for all my voice agents because it handles the hard parts (speech-to-text, text-to-speech, telephony) and lets me focus on agent logic.
Why Retell Over Alternatives
I evaluated VAPI, Bland AI, and Retell. Here's why I chose Retell:
- Better voice quality — Uses ElevenLabs Pro voices, sounds genuinely human
- Flexible LLM integration — Bring your own Claude API, not locked to GPT-4
- Real-time streaming — Sub-500ms response times for natural conversation
- Phone number provisioning — One-click to get a business phone number
- Webhook-driven — Easy to integrate with existing systems
Complete Retell + Claude Setup
Here's the full architecture for a production voice agent:
// 1. Create Retell agent (one-time setup)
const retellAgent = await fetch('https://api.retellai.com/create-agent', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.RETELL_API_KEY}`,
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
},
body: JSON.stringify({
agent_name: 'BellaBot',
voice_id: 'elevenlabs-rachel', // Choose from Retell voice catalog
language: 'en-US',
webhook_url: 'https://yourdomain.com/api/retell/webhook',
initial_message: 'Hi! This is Bella with VIXI. How can I help you today?',
response_timeout: 5000, // 5s silence before prompting user
}),
});
// 2. Your webhook receives events
// app/api/retell/webhook/route.ts
import { anthropic } from '@/lib/anthropic';
export async function POST(request: Request) {
const event = await request.json();
switch (event.event_type) {
case 'call_started':
// Initialize conversation state
await initCallSession(event.call_id);
break;
case 'transcript_update':
// User spoke, generate response
const response = await generateResponse(event);
return NextResponse.json({
response_text: response.text,
end_call: response.shouldEndCall,
transfer_number: response.transferTo,
});
case 'call_ended':
// Log final transcript, update CRM
await finalizeCall(event.call_id, event.transcript);
break;
}
return NextResponse.json({ success: true });
}
async function generateResponse(event) {
const message = await anthropic.messages.create({
model: 'claude-sonnet-4-20250514',
max_tokens: 300, // Short responses for voice
temperature: 0.3,
system: BELLABOT_SYSTEM_PROMPT_V3,
messages: [
{
role: 'user',
content: `Conversation so far:
${event.transcript}
User just said: "${event.user_message}"
What should you respond? Keep it conversational and under 50 words.`
}
]
});
return {
text: message.content[0].text,
shouldEndCall: message.content[0].text.includes('[END CALL]'),
transferTo: extractPhoneNumber(message.content[0].text),
};
}Voice-Specific Prompt Optimizations
Voice agents need different prompting than text agents:
- Keep responses short — Target 1-3 sentences, max 50 words. Long responses sound robotic.
- Use natural speech patterns — Include filler words occasionally: "Um, let me check..." "Great question!"
- Avoid technical jargon — Say "your website" not "your web application." Voice is more casual.
- Confirm understanding — Repeat key info back: "Just to confirm, you need the appointment on Thursday at 2 PM, correct?"
- Handle interruptions — Build in phrases like "Sorry, I didn't catch that" for crosstalk
These optimizations took BellaBot from "obviously a bot" to "I thought I was talking to a real person" feedback. The cost per call runs $0.08-$0.15 depending on length, making it dramatically cheaper than hiring a receptionist.
Token Optimization Strategies
My 11 agents process roughly 800-1,200 API calls per day. At $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens (Claude Sonnet 4.6 pricing), poor token management would cost $500+/month. With optimization, I run the entire fleet for $45-$80/month.
Technique 1: Prompt Compression
My initial BellaBot system prompt was 3,200 tokens. After compression:
// BEFORE (3,200 tokens) You are BellaBot, a professional and friendly call screening assistant... [verbose instructions] When a caller mentions they are interested in our services, you should... [repetitive examples] // AFTER (680 tokens) You are BellaBot. Screen calls for VIXI. Role: Greet → Qualify → Book/Transfer Qualify = Budget $5k+, Timeline <90d, Service fit Responses: - Qualified: "Let's schedule! Thu 2PM or Fri 10AM?" - Not qualified: "I'll email you details within 24h" - Spam: "Not interested, thanks!" [END] Never: Make up info, quote prices, collect payment
Result: 79% token reduction with zero accuracy loss. Claude is smart enough to interpret compressed instructions when written clearly.
Technique 2: Context Caching (Claude's Hidden Feature)
Claude offers prompt caching that reduces costs by 90% for repeated system prompts:
const message = await anthropic.messages.create({
model: 'claude-sonnet-4-20250514',
max_tokens: 1024,
system: [
{
type: 'text',
text: BELLABOT_SYSTEM_PROMPT_V3,
cache_control: { type: 'ephemeral' } // Cache this!
}
],
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: userInput }]
});
// First call: Full cost (3,200 input tokens)
// Subsequent calls within 5 min: 90% cheaper (cached)For high-volume agents, caching saves 60-70% on token costs. My lead qualifier agent processes 300+ leads/day—caching cut costs from $8/day to $2.50/day.
Technique 3: Smart Context Windows
Don't send full conversation history every time. Summarize older messages:
// Bad: Send entire 50-message conversation (10k+ tokens)
const messages = allMessages; // $$$$
// Good: Summarize + keep last 5 messages
const messages = [
{
role: 'user',
content: `[Summary] Previous conversation: User is interested in n8n automation services. Budget confirmed at $12k. Needs timeline estimate.`
},
...last5Messages // Only recent context
];
// Saves 8,000+ tokens per callI use a separate "summarizer agent" that condenses long conversations into 200-word summaries. This runs once per conversation and saves 10x its own cost.
Error Recovery and Fallback Strategies
Production AI agents will fail. APIs timeout. Models hallucinate. Networks drop. Your job isn't to prevent failures—it's to recover gracefully.
My Error Recovery Framework
async function callAgentWithFallbacks(input: string) {
// Try Claude Sonnet 4.6 first
try {
return await callClaude('claude-sonnet-4-20250514', input);
} catch (error) {
console.error('Sonnet 4.6 failed:', error);
// Fallback 1: Try Haiku (faster, cheaper, less capable)
try {
return await callClaude('claude-haiku-20250303', input);
} catch (error2) {
console.error('Haiku failed:', error2);
// Fallback 2: GPT-4o-mini
try {
return await callOpenAI('gpt-4o-mini', input);
} catch (error3) {
console.error('All models failed:', error3);
// Fallback 3: Canned response
return {
response: "I'm experiencing technical difficulties. Please contact support@vixi.agency or call +1-555-0123.",
intent: 'error',
requiresHumanReview: true,
};
}
}
}
}Timeout Handling
Set aggressive timeouts to fail fast:
const controller = new AbortController();
const timeout = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), 8000); // 8s max
try {
const message = await anthropic.messages.create({
model: 'claude-sonnet-4-20250514',
max_tokens: 1024,
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: input }],
}, {
signal: controller.signal, // Abort on timeout
});
clearTimeout(timeout);
return message;
} catch (error) {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') {
// Model took too long, use cached response
return getCachedResponse(input);
}
throw error;
}Confidence Scoring for Safety
For high-stakes decisions, require agent confidence scores:
system: `Rate your confidence on every response (0.0-1.0).
If confidence < 0.8, say "I'm not certain, let me get a human to help."`
// In your code
const { response, confidence } = await callAgent(input);
if (confidence < 0.8) {
// Flag for human review
await notifyHuman({
input,
agentResponse: response,
confidence,
priority: confidence < 0.5 ? 'high' : 'medium',
});
// Send safe fallback to user
return "Great question—let me have a specialist reach out within 2 hours.";
}This prevents agents from confidently saying wrong things. BellaBot escalates 6-8% of calls to humans, maintaining 94% satisfaction while avoiding costly mistakes.
Deployment on Vercel with n8n Orchestration
I deploy all my agents on Vercel (API routes) orchestrated by n8n (workflow automation). This architecture gives me serverless scalability + visual workflow management.
Deployment Architecture
- Claude agents — Deployed as Next.js API routes on Vercel
- n8n coordinator — Self-hosted on Railway, orchestrates agent calls
- Supabase — Database for conversation logs, agent memory, training data
- Retell AI — Voice infrastructure for phone-based agents
- Upstash Redis — Caching layer for frequently accessed data
n8n Workflow for Lead Processing
Here's how I use n8n to orchestrate my 5-agent lead processing system:
n8n Workflow: "Lead Intelligence Pipeline"
[Webhook] New lead from website
↓
[Router Agent] Analyze lead source & completeness
↓
├─→ [Qualifier Agent] Score lead quality
│ ↓
│ [IF] Score > 7 → High Priority
│ ↓
│ [Researcher Agent] Enrich: LinkedIn + Website
│ ↓
│ [Outreach Agent] Generate personalized email
│ ↓
│ [Send Email] via SendGrid
│
└─→ [IF] Incomplete data → Request more info
↓
[Send SMS] via Twilio
[ALL paths] → [Log to Supabase] → [Notify Slack]The beauty of n8n is that I can visualize this entire flow, A/B test different agent configurations, and monitor success rates—all without touching code.
Environment Variables for Multi-Agent Deployment
# .env.production ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-... RETELL_API_KEY=retell_... SUPABASE_URL=https://... SUPABASE_KEY=eyJ... REDIS_URL=redis://... # Agent configuration BELLABOT_PROMPT_VERSION=v3.2.1 QUALIFIER_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD=0.80 RESEARCHER_MAX_PARALLEL_CALLS=3 # Feature flags ENABLE_VOICE_AGENTS=true ENABLE_LEAD_SCORING=true USE_PROMPT_CACHING=true
Environment-based configuration lets me test new agent versions in staging before deploying to production. I can also feature-flag expensive operations (like the Researcher Agent) to control costs during high-volume periods.
Case Study: 80% Manual Labor Reduction for CQ Marketing
Let me share the real numbers from my most successful agent deployment. CQ Marketing, a Dallas-based marketing agency, was drowning in lead processing work—their team spent 4-6 hours daily qualifying, researching, and following up with inbound leads.
The Problem
Before agents:
- 250-300 leads/month from paid ads + SEO
- 2 team members spending 20+ hours/week on manual qualification
- 48-hour average response time to new leads
- Only 30% of leads received personalized outreach (bandwidth constraint)
- No systematic follow-up for "maybe" leads
The Solution
I deployed my 5-agent lead processing system integrated with their existing stack (HubSpot CRM, Google Workspace, Slack):
- Router Agent — Triages leads in <10 seconds
- Qualifier Agent — Scores 1-10 using their custom rubric
- Researcher Agent — Enriches with company data (tech stack, funding, team size)
- Outreach Agent — Generates hyper-personalized emails referencing their website, recent news, tech stack
- Scheduler Agent — Manages discovery call bookings via Calendly
The Results (90 Days)
- 82% time saved — From 20 hours/week to 3.5 hours (human review only)
- 8-minute response time — Down from 48 hours (95% under 15 minutes)
- 100% personalization — Every qualified lead gets custom outreach
- 34% increase in booked demos — From 18/month to 24/month (faster follow-up + better targeting)
- $0.42 per lead processed — Total cost including API calls, hosting, monitoring
The ROI was immediate. At $75/hour for team time, they saved $1,200/week in labor. Total agent infrastructure cost: $180/month. ROI: 27x in month one.
But the bigger win was scaling. Their team can now handle 500+ leads/month without hiring additional staff. The agents work 24/7, respond instantly, and never forget to follow up.
What They Say
"Carlos built us an AI team that works around the clock. Our response times went from 'eventually' to 'instantly,' and the personalization is incredible—prospects think a human wrote every email. We've added 30% more pipeline capacity without hiring anyone."
— Sarah Chen, COO at CQ Marketing
This is what production AI agents look like when done right. Not flashy demos—real work, real ROI, real scale.
Conclusion: The Future is Agentic
AI agents aren't the future—they're the present. My clients are already saving 60-80% of time on repetitive knowledge work. The agencies that deploy agents in 2026 will have a massive competitive advantage over those still doing everything manually.
Here's what I believe about the next 12-24 months:
- Every business will have agents — Just like every business has a website today
- Multi-agent orchestration becomes standard — Single "do everything" agents will be seen as outdated
- Voice agents replace most phone support — 80%+ of inbound calls handled by AI
- Agent-to-agent communication — Your scheduling agent will negotiate with my sales agent
- Specialized industry agents — Vertical-specific agents trained on domain knowledge (legal, medical, financial)
The bottleneck isn't the technology—it's implementation expertise. Claude API is incredibly powerful, but most developers don't know how to architect production systems, engineer reliable prompts, or handle the edge cases that break naive implementations.
That's what I do. I've built 11 production agents processing 1,000+ interactions daily with 93-96% satisfaction rates. If you want agents that actually work—not demos that impress investors but fall apart in production—this is what it takes.
Based in Allen, TX, I build AI agent systems for agencies, B2B SaaS companies, and service businesses. Typical clients see 60-80% reduction in manual labor and 3-6x ROI within 90 days.
Ready to build your agent team? Let's talk. I'll audit your workflows and show you exactly which processes can be automated with AI agents—and give you a detailed roadmap for implementation.
Carlos Aragon
AI Agent Builder & Automation Expert | Allen, TX
Carlos runs 11 AI agents in production across his agency and client systems. He specializes in Claude API development, multi-agent orchestration, voice AI with Retell, n8n workflow automation, and production deployment strategies. Based in Allen, TX, he works with agencies and B2B companies through VIXI LLC to build agents that reduce manual labor by 60-80%.